tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2799451770086337664.post5948807152934345862..comments2024-03-26T14:01:36.240-05:00Comments on Public Policy Polling: Louisiana Poll PreviewTom Jensenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06545052616714485196noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2799451770086337664.post-27456227809440606802010-08-25T14:26:58.822-05:002010-08-25T14:26:58.822-05:00Why did you leak to TPM that Vitter leads 51-41 an...Why did you leak to TPM that Vitter leads 51-41 and then hold back on publishing it yet?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2799451770086337664.post-55380749405783654072010-08-25T14:21:05.444-05:002010-08-25T14:21:05.444-05:00When are these numbers coming out....When are these numbers coming out....Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2799451770086337664.post-72865873136592404032010-08-25T03:09:14.756-05:002010-08-25T03:09:14.756-05:00All things considered, it will nonetheless be Davi...All things considered, it will nonetheless be David Vitter winning big in November.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2799451770086337664.post-74439076135981168992010-08-24T17:55:29.947-05:002010-08-24T17:55:29.947-05:00Dustin, that's too bad. I would think that the...Dustin, that's too bad. I would think that the Brent Furer thing would be sticking more than the other one with Louisiana voters. It sure sticks more with me.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2799451770086337664.post-15527776161151273052010-08-24T16:27:12.838-05:002010-08-24T16:27:12.838-05:00"Did you do any Brent Furer questions?"
..."Did you do any Brent Furer questions?"<br /><br />No.<br /><br />CL: I imagine you were of the same mindset in the '90s regarding Clinton.Dustin Ingallshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00599131416393266722noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2799451770086337664.post-21597695178225938992010-08-24T14:52:35.312-05:002010-08-24T14:52:35.312-05:00Christian Liberty:
Are you for sleazy "diape...Christian Liberty:<br /><br />Are you for sleazy "diaper" David? What do you think about Brent Furer? Letting someone continue to work on women's issues/giving him a pay raise after he had attacked women? I want an ethical Congress first, then a partisan Congress. I am willing to vote out Democrats, and replace them with Republicans and vise versa if they have ethical problems.<br /><br />Dustin & Tom:<br />Did you do any Brent Furer questions?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2799451770086337664.post-83707114611848844072010-08-24T14:33:24.608-05:002010-08-24T14:33:24.608-05:00"Government is not reason; it is not eloquent..."Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master." <br />George Washington <br /><br />As the Founding Fathers intended (and as all moral and rational people would support) those elected to federal government must always be those who believe that government power MUST be LIMITED. Until the Democrat senate leader rejoins the mainstream and steps back from their far-far-left extremism, voters will reject anyone who would support or condone the far-left Democrat tyranny. The mainstream of voters will continue to support the mainstream of elected officials, those who believe that the federal government has become much too powerful and must be downsized.Christian Libertyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04842885802414436051noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2799451770086337664.post-17738310346756862352010-08-24T14:25:17.711-05:002010-08-24T14:25:17.711-05:00"a better representative of Christian values&..."a better representative of Christian values"<br /><br />There's a big difference between someone acting as a moral private individual... and entrusting someone with government power. If voters are to entrust someone with government power, they would need to make the moral choices on taxes, the role of government, energy production, healthcare, etc. In short, they would need to support LIMITED, CONSTITUTIONAL government. So it is no surprise at all that conservative ideology is more important in a government official than is their personal lives. Why trust a Democrat who would make the wrong decision on every important issue, just because he lives an upstanding personal life? An elected official's support of constitutional principles is more important to his role as an elected official than his personal life. <br /><br />Exactly what part of that do you not understand?!? Government must be limited. Elected officials must support limiting the power of the federal government or they cannot be trusted to be a part of the federal government.Christian Libertyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04842885802414436051noreply@blogger.com