Claire McCaskill's endured a lot of bad press over the last two months since PPP last polled Missouri, but at least in the short term it doesn't appear to be affecting her prospects for reelection. McCaskill's approval rating in early March was 46% and now it's still 46%. McCaskll had small leads over a cadre of potential Republican opponents in early March and she still has small leads over all of her potential foes. This continues to look like a toss up race, as it has for months now, but McCaskill's position now is no worse than it was before the issue of her airplane and its related taxes hit the news.
46% of voters in the state approve of the job McCaskill is doing to 47% who disapprove. Feelings about her continue to be almost completely polarized along party lines. Only 11% of Republicans like how she's doing, but at the same time just 13% of Democrats are unhappy with her. McCaskill's numbers are a strong contrast to, for instance, Governor Jay Nixon who is liked by many Republicans but also disliked by many Democrats. McCaskill is in positive territory with independents this time around at 50/43.
McCaskill has small leads over five potential Republicans we tested against her. Todd Akin continues to be the strongest, trailing by just a single point at 46-45. That result is basically unchanged from a 45-44 McCaskill lead on our last poll. Doing next best are Sarah Steelman and Blaine Luetkemeyer who each trail by 3 points at 45-42. The Steelman margin is exactly identical to our March poll, while this is the first time we've polled Luetkemeyer. John Brunner, tested for the first time, trails 47-41 and Ed Martin does the worst with a 46-39 deficit, almost identical to the 46-40 spread he trailed by on our previous poll.
These margins don't exactly look comfortable for McCaskill and a look inside the numbers suggests they're likely to get worse. There are a good deal more undecided Republicans than Democrats in all of these match ups- 5% more undecided GOP voters against Steelman, 6% more against Akin, 10% more against Luetkemeyer, 11% more against Brunner, and 12% more against Martin. If those folks end up coming 'home' you're looking at each of the Republican picking up another 2-4 points on the margin.
Why are there so many more Republican undecideds? The crop of GOP candidates continues to be mostly unknown to voters in the state. None of them reaches 50% name recognition. Steelman is the best known with 48% of voters having an opinion about her, 26% positive and 22% negative. She's followed by 39% who know Akin (18/21), 36% who know Luetkemeyer (14/22), 31% who know Martin (11/20), and 27% who know Brunner (8/19).
The state of this race remains the same- McCaskill is one of the most vulnerable incumbents up for reelection next year. But the bad news cycles she endured over the last few months seemed like they had the potential to shift this race to one where she was favored to lose. In that sense the continued toss up status of the contest is good news for her.
Full results here
did you guys poll a brewer vs. goddard rematch in the Arizona poll you'll be releasing
ReplyDelete3rd most vulnerable seat, after ND and NE. Tester is looking slightly safer than McCaskill.
ReplyDeleteAnother joke of a poll by left leaning public policy Liberals what a joke.
ReplyDeleteOf course, McCaskill is "steady" according to PPP. Which Dem isn't "steady" according to you guys?? Just like your Wisconson polls 2 months ago showed Dems on the ascendant there. Your WIS polls were a joke, and so are all the other polls you put out these days: They are designed to push a story line and make Libs feel good.
ReplyDeleteI suspect you'll be out with polls soon showing Libs have a good shot at Barasso in WY and Wicker in MS. Or maybe a poll with Obama competetitive in UT soon. I predict as we get closer to teh 2012, your polls will become more credible so avoid become a laughingstock with your rigged polls.
@Smooth Jazz:
ReplyDeleteDon't worry, the laughingstock award still goes to Rasmussen.