North Carolina isn't exactly a bastion of liberalism but even there a majority of voters think it's off base for candidates to exploit the proposed 'Ground Zero mosque' as a campaign issue. 51% label doing so as 'inappropriate' to just 37% who consider it to be an acceptable tactic.
This is particularly pertinent in the Triangle where Renee Ellmers, challenging long time Democratic Congressman Bob Etheridge, has run television ads about the mosque. Voters in that part of the state are particularly strong in their views that it's inappropriate with 56% expressing that sentiment.
Invoking the mosque is seen as acceptable by the Republican base, with 60% of GOP voters saying they think it's appropriate to only 29% who object. But for Ellmers to win she's going to have to take an overwhelming share of independents and also capture a healthy level of Democratic support. With those key groups exploiting the mosque is seen as particularly inappropriate- 68% of Democrats and 50% of independents share that feeling.
The mosque ad may end up hurting the GOP's long shot chances of knocking off Bob Etheridge but the overall picture for Republicans in the state when it comes to the House looks somewhat encouraging. North Carolina voters prefer a generic Republican for Congress over a Democrat 51-42. That's because of an overwhelming advantage for the GOP with independents, 53-27, and because 17% of Democrats are leaning toward voting Republican while only 2% are planning to cross party lines in the other direction.
The reality though is that North Carolina's potentially vulnerable members of Congress- Etheridge, Mike McIntyre, Larry Kissell, and Health Shuler- have always run well ahead of overall Democratic performance in their districts. So the GOP might be ahead of a generic Democrat in those places but the actual Democrats holding the seats in those districts are going to be harder to defeat.
Full results here
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
It's difficult to say whether 51% saying the ad is "inappropriate" really means its not effective. Voters swear up and down every year that they don't like negative advertising, yet it remains the most effective way of campaigning nationwide.
Tom why is this poll even relevant if you have 53% of the people in the poll voting for McCain when Obama won this state??? I just can't figure out your reasoning.
This is a likely voter poll for the 2010 election. The people who turn out in 2010 in NC will not have cast a majority of their votes for John McCain- Democratic turnout will be way down.
The Republicans have politicized this? REALLY?!!? Wow.
"The Republicans have politicized this? REALLY?!!? Wow."
Uh, yeah, they have. It's certainly not Democrats making an issue out of it.
It was effective at getting Etheridge to publicly take a stand against the mosque. Any time you can force an opponent to get distracted and off-message (especially if you're the challenger) it's worth it.
Also "inappropriate" is tough to evaluate. "Offensive" or "shameful" might have been more useful. All sorts of things are inappropriate but totally forgettable by the time election day comes around. Good point by VA Blogger that voters say they hate negative advertising, even though it's so effective.
Post a Comment